|Posted by OpenHouse|
"You could say graffiti is ugly, selfish and that it's just the action of people who want some pathetic kind of fame. But if that's true it's only because graffiti writers are just like everyone else in this fucking country"
That quote itself is kind of pathetic. Bank robbers or serial killers could just as effectively use that to justify their crimes.
There is a sliding scale of ethics. Obviously urban exploring isn't as selfless as donating blood, but for reasons that should be obvious it is less intrusive and has fewer consequences than doing the same activity plus graffiti. They commit more and worse legal offences, damage property, get sites locked down, contribute to urban decay and theoretically increase crime rates, and put our community at greater risk.
Criminal activity is relative and measurable. Going back to bank robbers, some of them kill people during their robberies, and some don't. I doubt there'd be much debate on their moral relativity and whether the latter deserve lighter punishment than the former.
|Posted by HornetWrath|
I've yet to see the amazing quality works people post pics of. However the buildings I've been to all have forests of penis shafts in them. I don't see art.
In Korea, the most popular graffiti is just the word "sex," written in English. This
is the only case I can think of of graffiti showing a dick.