forums
new posts
donate
UER Store
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




UER Forum > Private Boards Index > Religious Discussion > Seperation of Church and State (Viewed 1219 times)
Curious_George 


Location: Cambridge
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


Straight outta New Bedlam

 |  | 
Seperation of Church and State
< on 9/30/2004 11:17 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I was wondering what people's views on the Seperation of Church and State were?

For me I support the seperation as it has been shown in the past that when the church has been involved in politics it has contorted the core value's of the religion.




IrishLady 


Location: The South
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 4 likes


These are the breaks.

 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 1 on 10/7/2004 7:14 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
That is a hard one for me. I do agree there should be separation, but I don't know if it should be total or not.....
I think it is more important to take the politics out of religion than the other way around




So I said "Why don't you shove it where the sun don't shine" and so he did. He put it in the cupboard under the stairs and it hasn't been mentioned since.
-Stephen Fry
Kenshin 


Location: Eagan, MN
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  |  | Add to ICQ | AIM Message
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 2 on 10/13/2004 2:57 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
No where in the Bill of Rights does the seperation of Church and State occur. The actual first ammendment is here:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I firmly believe that our founding fathers never meant for the terminology of Seperation of Church and State or the implications behind it to ever even be introduced. They were all very strong Christians. If they had truly meant for that terminology to be introduced, I do not think that they would have started every Congressional session with prayer. I do not believe that they would have prayed about going to war with Great Britian for our independence, which is what they did.




Servo 


Total Likes: 1 like




 |  | 
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 3 on 10/20/2004 5:58 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Well, think about it. Wouldn't you say that in order for there to be religious freedom as described in the First Amendment, that you can't legislate things based on one given religion? You can't have it both ways.

Sorry, I'm spying. I wouldn't do it except that Irish can beat me up in real life.




Valiant Dancer 


Location: Villa Park, IL
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  | 
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 4 on 10/27/2004 2:30 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
Posted by Curious_George
I was wondering what people's views on the Seperation of Church and State were?

For me I support the seperation as it has been shown in the past that when the church has been involved in politics it has contorted the core value's of the religion.


My views are that whenever religion and government were comingled, both suffered greatly. Kenshin rightly says that nowhere in the Bill of Rights or Constitution the phrase "seperation of church and state" occurs. This was a phrase in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to a Christian minister. However, this concept is codified in the Constitution and defined by case law.

1) The First Amendment stricture against Congress passing any law respecting the establishment of religion.

2) The 14th Amendment which, along with Supreme Court case law, transfers the First Amendment strictures to the state governments.

3) Article VI, Clause 3 which forbids a religious test for positions of public trust. (Used to overturn state constitutions which mandate Christian only elected or appointed officials)

4) centuries of case law which the SCOTUS and state supreme courts held the government incompetent to direct or judge internal matters of church doctorine.

5) An 1872 Ohio supreme court case (Minor v. Board of Education of Cincinatti) where school lead prayer was outlawed.

6) The founding fathers were not all Christians. They were, however, mindful of the Church of England and the evils evident in the comingling of religion and government. This is to say that besides ceremonial shows of religion, no sectarian laws should be passed. (The 1954 and 1956 Acts directly flew in the face of this, but more on that later.)

It is my ardent belief that the 1954 and 1956 Acts were enacted improperly.

First some background.

1954 Act - Added the words "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance.

1956 Act - Changed the National Motto to "In God We Trust" from "E Pluribus Unum", commanded the motto be placed on currency, and changed the oathes of office for federal judges to include "so help me God".

To illustrate how these laws had no secular purpose came from quotes by the primaries for the 1954 legislation.

"From this day forward, the millions of our school children will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our Nation and our people to the Almighty" -- President Dwight Eisenhower while signing this legislation (100 Congressional Record 8618)

"At this moment of our history the principals underlying our American Government and the American way of life are under attack by a system whose philosophy is at direct odds with our own. Our American Government is founded on the concept of the individuality and the dignity of the human being. Underlying this concept is the belief that the human person is important because he was created by God and endowed by Him with certain inalienable rights which no civil authority may usurp. The inclusion of God in our pledge therefore would further acknowledge the dependence of our people and our government upon the moral directions of the Creator. At the same time it would serve to deny the atheistic and materialistic concepts of communism with its attendant subservience of the individual." -- H.R. Rep. No. 83-1693 at 1-2 (1954)

The 1956 Act adds the religious test violation.

The institutionalized school prayer ban (individuals cannot be legally stopped from praying) from these quotes from Board of Education of Cincinnati v. Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211, 253 (1872)

"The government is neutral, and, while protecting all, it prefers none, and it disparages none." -- Justice Clark writing for the majority

"The great bulk of human affairs and human interests is left by any free government to individual enterprise and individual action. Religion is eminently one of these interests, lying outside the true and legitimate province of government.

The place of religion in our society is an exalted one, achieved through a long tradition of reliance on the home, the church and the inviolable citadel of the individual heart and mind. We have come to recognize through bitter experience that it is not within the power of government to invade that citadel, whether its purpose or effect be to aid or oppose, to advance or retard. In the relationship between man and religion, the State is firmly committed to a position of neutrality. Though the application of that rule requires interpretation of a delicate sort, the rule itself is clearly and concisely stated in the words of the First Amendment. " -- Justice Clark writing for the majority


I believe that religion is between the individual and their deity. Government should not get involved. Since the majority of individuals in the US are religious, governmental bodies and the military have sometimes found it necessary to hire clergy to minister and comfort members. Since the clergy have no force of law, it is classed as ceremonial deism.



[last edit 10/27/2004 2:31 PM by Valiant Dancer - edited 1 times]

IrishLady 


Location: The South
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 4 likes


These are the breaks.

 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 5 on 10/27/2004 3:31 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
"The government is neutral, and, while protecting all, it prefers none, and it disparages none."


If that were actually true, I think it would be better. Potecting all, and the keywords, Perfering none.




So I said "Why don't you shove it where the sun don't shine" and so he did. He put it in the cupboard under the stairs and it hasn't been mentioned since.
-Stephen Fry
Servo 


Total Likes: 1 like




 |  | 
Re: Seperation of Church and State
< Reply # 6 on 10/27/2004 6:52 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Wow, I wish we had people like that in office now (referring to Clark).




UER Forum > Private Boards Index > Religious Discussion > Seperation of Church and State (Viewed 1219 times)


Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.



All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 740840590 pages have been generated.