|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
OCInfiltrator
Location: Ottawa, ON Gender: Male Total Likes: 0 likes
| | | Re: favourite locomotive < Reply # 60 on 1/10/2008 3:57 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by ArmchairExplorer http://www.railfan...S/ome003cs.jpg.jpg Bombardier Talent DMU Not for us in North America, of course, as the FRA requires everything here be built heavily enough to survive driving into the walls at the edge of the world....
| Uhh we got a Bombardier Talent DMU operating in Ottawa on former Canadian Pacific Rail Tracks. We have 3 of them because bombardier won't take orders if we only order 1 or 2 of them so if we are to expand service, we need to order 3 more. Anyway my favorite locomotives are the F40PH and the Rohr Turbo. I like the job they did once they rebuilt both (6400 is the rebuilt F40PH in Canada, it's in the P42DC Livery). I am a fan of modernizing stuff because it means the old stuff can still run with modern tech. It's a cool combination. Plus it saves the locomotive or train from the scrapheap and future generations can see it running still.
[last edit 1/10/2008 4:02 PM by OCInfiltrator - edited 2 times]
| |
| SteamPunk
Location: Sailing the seas of sleaze. Gender: Neither Total Likes: 17 likes
| | | Re: favourite locomotive < Reply # 61 on 1/10/2008 10:02 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | http://www.railpow...ts_hl_gallery.html If you go to the GG Emerald (one of the first),at the bottom, you will notice the first pick is in the desert..that's because the US Army bought the exclusive rights to it. The other 3 pic's are in Vancouver, yard dogging it in CP's waterfront to williston yards during development. I'm kinda pissed...when are the railways going to employ a elec regenerative systems, rather than burning it up through dynamic braking resistance grids!!! only then will I have a road favorite!!! (even if it was a detachable storage slug). I hate how the US military bought the rights to the "green goat" so they could suppress the tech, and selfishly use it for themselves as a tactical advantage. http://www.railpow...s_hl_ggseries.html (A local innovation, it was nice to see it switching here).
[last edit 1/10/2008 10:08 PM by SteamPunk - edited 1 times]
| I used to be with it, but then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me, and it'll happen to you, too! |
| Cherokee
Location: Portland Gender: Male Total Likes: 139 likes
Consider the lily
| | | | Re: favourite locomotive < Reply # 67 on 10/25/2016 12:01 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Haven't seen anybody mention the art deco T1; The Pennsylvania Railroad's 52 T1 class duplex-drive 4-4-4-4 steam locomotives, introduced in 1942 (2 prototypes) and 1945-1946 (50 production), were their last steam locomotives built and their most controversial. They were ambitious, technologically sophisticated, powerful, fast, and distinctively streamlined by Raymond Loewy. However, they were also prone to wheelslip both when starting and at speed, complicated to maintain, and expensive to run. The PRR vowed in 1948 to place diesel locomotives on all express passenger trains, leaving unanswered questions of whether the T1's flaws were solvable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRR_T1
| When there is tranquility, you are in the right place. When there are no footprints, you are on the right path. When there are no tire tracks, you are on the right road. |
| Soldat
Location: Philadelphia, PA Gender: Male Total Likes: 659 likes
The Mayor of Noobtown
| | | | Re: favourite locomotive < Reply # 68 on 10/10/2017 12:49 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by Cherokee Haven't seen anybody mention the art deco T1;
The Pennsylvania Railroad's 52 T1 class duplex-drive 4-4-4-4 steam locomotives, introduced in 1942 (2 prototypes) and 1945-1946 (50 production), were their last steam locomotives built and their most controversial. They were ambitious, technologically sophisticated, powerful, fast, and distinctively streamlined by Raymond Loewy. However, they were also prone to wheelslip both when starting and at speed, complicated to maintain, and expensive to run. The PRR vowed in 1948 to place diesel locomotives on all express passenger trains, leaving unanswered questions of whether the T1's flaws were solvable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRR_T1
| I love the T1, they were awesome, just were too big for most of the East Coast track that the PRR ran. If UP had those they would have been a lot more successful. That said, the PRR S1 was also sexy as shit.
| |
| |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 218 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739119420 pages have been generated.
|
|