forums
new posts
donate
UER Store
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




1 2  
UER Forum > Private Boards Index > Relationships > monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary (Viewed 3588 times)
rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< on 7/7/2005 11:39 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
if everyone wasnt sooooo hung up on monogamy, how much hurt would be saved and how many failed relationships would still work? Hmmmm?

(just my own form of a rant..please dont take any personal insult from the thread title)




ducky 999
Stewie 


Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 2 likes


kill your idols

 |  |  | lol, art
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 1 on 7/8/2005 4:27 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
You can swear on here

shitfuckasscockcunt




> The hierarchy of power dictates that the person with the most power does the least amount of work and retains the highest benefit.
J-A-M 


Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 2 on 7/8/2005 7:13 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Posted by Particle Man
You can swear on here

shitfuckasscockcunt




LMFAO that's the funniest thing I've seen today!




rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 3 on 7/8/2005 7:43 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I also say its full of shit cuz 70% of dudes and 60% of girls who claim monogamy cheat, thus making the majority of them hypocrites and liars.





ducky 999
Frozen 


Location: Minneapolis, MN
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


Three-D

 |  |  | The Frozen Crystal Underground
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 4 on 7/15/2005 11:39 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
rz350, you are right, monagomy is crap. But most people aren't able to deal with the jealousy that often tends to ensue in polyamorous relationships




Urban Exploration
rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 5 on 7/16/2005 12:09 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
but only cuz their brought up that way. If I ever have kids, im gonna bring em up for polyamoury (or rather, just not condemn it and talk all taht shit about having a one and only and ect)




ducky 999
drinking_sand 


Location: Catskill Mountains, NY
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes


on sabbatical

 |  |  | Yahoo! IM
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 6 on 7/16/2005 12:12 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Posted by rz350
but only cuz their brought up that way. If I ever have kids, im gonna bring em up for polyamoury (or rather, just not condemn it and talk all taht shit about having a one and only and ect)


Well since children learn about marriage and relationships primarily from the example you set for them, you better hope you have a wife that is into that kind of relationship.... Good luck!





rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 7 on 7/17/2005 12:59 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
yes...its the only way I would live. Tho thats a big if. I think id much rather be a perma-bachelor. So much more fun




ducky 999
sharon 


Location: denver colorado
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | couchsurfing
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 8 on 2/19/2006 9:50 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
definitely don't think monogamy is a sustainable form of long term partnering up. would like to think i'm a settled and confident enough person to deal with my partner having multiple (safe) partners when we got sexually bored with each other. don't know. anyone had an open relationship? i'm not talking cheating, but communicatively honestly open with multiple fuck partners?




rainman8889 


Location: H.T.S.F.C. Time to gain and a time to lose.
Total Likes: 26 likes


Bye for now.

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 9 on 2/20/2006 12:57 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Nah! I prefer one partner. Keeps me on my toes and we get creative in keeping each other (shall we say) interested.
Yeah, I may sound boring but hey, its just my two cents worth!




Gone for a while. Be back when I'm back.
rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 10 on 2/20/2006 8:19 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Posted by sharon
definitely don't think monogamy is a sustainable form of long term partnering up. would like to think i'm a settled and confident enough person to deal with my partner having multiple (safe) partners when we got sexually bored with each other. don't know. anyone had an open relationship? i'm not talking cheating, but communicatively honestly open with multiple fuck partners?


I have, and it was the best!




ducky 999
sharon 


Location: denver colorado
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | couchsurfing
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 11 on 2/21/2006 7:46 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
how long did it last? did both of you hanky panky around? was an open relationship established from the start, or did it evolve into one? come one, details!




Path Walker 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: Mobile, AL
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


Urban Ranger

 |  |  | AIM Message
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 12 on 2/21/2006 10:21 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I stopped "believing" in monogamy back in high school. I can count the number of girls I was actually faithful to on one hand... I suppose that I should actually have stopped believing in it after my dad started flying me to Texas with him when I was 8 for his week-long "business trips" to see his girlfriend while my mom stayed home with nothing to do... Though "rumor" has it she was equally "unfaithful". On the other hand, I've been completely faithful to Ana, whereas I cheated on my wife every chance that I got (including with Ana, though that actually became a really long, really Jerry Springer story).

Ana and I have been "swinging" for about 6 years now. We've had one solid, reliable 3some partner (a very good friend who's even gone exploring with me), and we've recently begun working on bringing others into our relationship. Right now it seems to be mostly single guys, though we're looking at couples as well (we're on a few sites), they're just not as plentiful. (As an aside, these are "MFM" 3somes - I'm not bi. Not that there's anything wrong with it, I just wanted to clarify.)

I suppose this is different than out-and-out polygamy/polyamory though, since we only do that kind of stuff as a couple. It's not like we're off screwing around behind each other's backs, though given our lifestyle (Dom/sub) we're literally contractually bound to never cheating on each other. Believe it or not, living this lifestyle has done unbelievable wonders for our relationship (hell, it's already outlasted my previous marriage!). I think that the swinging we do benefits our relationship not only by adding a bit of spice, but by introducing us to interesting friends we otherwise might never have met. For instance, one individual we just met last Sunday loves the outdoors and, while living in Oregon, loved to hike the Cascades, but he's never seen much less hiked/climbed the Adirondacks. Once the weather warms, we're probably going to take him to one of our favorite mountains. And the best thing about these guys is that it's not all about the sex - these people are friends that we have the opportunity to do the spank-shaggy with as long as everyone's in the mood. If one or more aren't in that mood, there's no loss, since we value each others' friendship and company.


Meh, my $.02...

~PW




Insanity is a city.
sharon 


Location: denver colorado
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | couchsurfing
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 13 on 2/22/2006 6:44 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
my attempt at swinging...ugh. so contrived. tried on line, met some couples, went to some parties...it was all about the other couple just wanting to swap when we clearly stated (and they agreed) to something else. it could be cool if it was a friend situation that just turned really fucking hot one night. kind of impromptu, not all planned out and cheesy porn like.




rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 14 on 2/22/2006 11:13 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Posted by sharon
how long did it last? did both of you hanky panky around? was an open relationship established from the start, or did it evolve into one? come one, details!


Open from the start, lasted for 8 months (she had to move home tho on the upside, she was into UE, and her home is moscow, so if I go, I get the grand tour of moscow underground!) Lots of hanky panky, it was the best...including 3somes.





ducky 999
sharon 


Location: denver colorado
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 0 likes




 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | couchsurfing
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 15 on 2/23/2006 12:27 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
so you're saying you ordered a bride and it didn't work out?




rz350 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: toronto
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


The looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 16 on 2/23/2006 12:50 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
nope, she was student at U of Toronto. But after her year, Visa was expired and she went back home.




ducky 999
Decoy 


Location: Leslieville
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


Oh I have slipped the bonds of earth...

 |  | 
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 17 on 2/27/2006 12:00 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I completely disagree. I've been with one girl for over 3 years and I can't even imagine myself in bed with another. Why would I bother? Why would she bother? We openly communicate and tell each other exactly what we're looking for - and then try to do the best we can to meet each others needs.
Seems to have worked so far.

Personally, I think that it's people who are afraid to commit - people that go around fucking one person after another - that are the ones missing out on somthing.




It's a drag, it's a bore, it's really such a pitty
To be lookin' at the board, not lookin' at the city.
Path Walker 

This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.


Location: Mobile, AL
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 0 likes


Urban Ranger

 |  |  | AIM Message
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 18 on 2/27/2006 12:44 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Posted by Decoy
Personally, I think that it's people who are afraid to commit - people that go around fucking one person after another - that are the ones missing out on somthing.


I have to agree with you on that one; buddy of mine finally settled down with a girl (ugly as sin, stinks, and I swear she's going to kill him in his sleep one of these nights... but I warned him) after spending a few months bouncing from chick to chick literally using them. He'd get them to the "I love you," point, but never say it back to them, have sex with them a few times, then get bored and move on.

Worst part is that Ana and I had been involving this guy in our "personal" life - if you will - for about 5 years, and she always kept telling me that she never wanted to have full intercourse with him because she didn't want to be a notch in his bedpost. Finally, I saw that she was right, and I'm glad I didn't press the issue.

~PW




Insanity is a city.
'Dukes 

Noble Donor


Gender: Male
Total Likes: 3 likes


At least someone llikes me

 |  |  | AIM Message
Re: monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary
< Reply # 19 on 6/16/2006 8:11 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
Is it the Asian dude my man?

I was wondering what significance he had, but quickly figured it out. heheh.




I got your tour winner right here pussies, at least he'd crash out trying.
UER Forum > Private Boards Index > Relationships > monogamy is more full of sh1t then a sanitary (Viewed 3588 times)
1 2  


Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.



All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 144 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 740668681 pages have been generated.