Posted by Soldat222 Idk, Im just tired of hearing ridiculous shit about thermite, controlled demolition, missiles into the pentagon, etc.

I'm sure Larry Silverstein is too. Just because you dislike it doesn't make it untrue. The fact that the authorities were predicting WTC7 would fall and in what direction, says a lot.

Posted by fedge The debunking by Popular Mechanics magazine? I'm waiting for Maxim magazine's investigation into the matter. Then we'll know.

Yeah, you're completely right. Much less credible than some college dropout with access to amazing super secret declassified files.

You're probably one who thinks the US never landed on the Moon.

Posted by Bryan Yeah, you're completely right. Much less credible than some college dropout with access to amazing super secret declassified files. You're probably one who thinks the US never landed on the Moon.

I'm very interested in astronomy. I have several telescopes and I enjoy looking at the crescent Mercury and Venus in the early evening skies. I've seen the four big moons of Jupiter with my binoculars even. So, no, you can't rile me with douchey statements like that.

Posted by fedge I'm sure Larry Silverstein is too. Just because you dislike it doesn't make it untrue. The fact that the authorities were predicting WTC7 would fall and in what direction, says a lot.

There were plenty of reasons to pull firemen out of WTC 7 and plenty of reasons for them to think it was going to collapse as well.

Some of them being guys inside hearing the buildings creak strangely enough to report it, huge chunks of it missing from collapsing debris from the towers, fires all throughout the building, not to mention it was constructed in a strange way.

Just to be an enabler . . . .
Back to Marvin Bush and Securatron?
Anyone?

http://www.infowar...does-not-collapse/

Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse
Paul Joseph Watson // Prison Planet.com // Monday, February 9, 2009

Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one?

Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top1a

A fierce fire consumed all 44 floors of a skyscraper in Beijing today, shooting 30 foot flames into the air, but unlike the similarly-sized 47-story WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just eight floors, the building in China did not collapse.

“The fire was burning from the ground floor to the top floor of the large building, the flames reflecting in the glass facade of the main CCTV tower next to the hotel and cultural center,” reports the New York Times.

“The 241-room Mandarin Oriental hotel in the building was due to open this year. Flames were spotted around 7:45 p.m. and within 20 minutes the fire had spread throughout the building, dominating that part of the city.”

“Hundreds of firefighting vehicles and police blocked off all approaches to the building - which was also set to house a luxury hotel due to be opened in 2009 - with flames appearing to leap 20 to 30 feet into the air,” adds The London Times.

Compare images of WTC 7 with those of the skyscraper fire in Beijing. Note that the Beijing skyscraper appears to be leaning due to the unorthodox design of the building - it did not suffer any kind of collapse.

Because WTC7 was built in America, using American materials.

WTC7 was built is a very strange way. It also had take considerable damage from the falling debris from the towers.