Posted by PorkChopExpress
Exactly. Yes he was/is 19, and could legally drive what he wants, but someone (ie - parents) should have stopped him from buying such a powerful car. No it's not their fault he did something incredibly stupid and wrecked. I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that teenagers - 1) Do not have enough experience to be driving powerful vehicles. and 2) Do not have the ability to control themselves nor to think ahead. That is why I would never let a teenager drive such a vehicle. Over 18 years of age or not.
|
that vintage Firebird wasn't really that powerful considering the power to weight ratio and the fact that the 350 was saddled with a 4speed auto. BUT, what did make that car a foolkiller was the fact that it would go pretty fast, homicidally fast for a novice and when it's limits were met, it was not an easy car to haul back from the edge. The Fox-body Mustang was worse, however, because it's power to weight ratio was ridiculous, weighed nothing and went like a scared car.
At speed, in my own experience, that vintage F-body was pretty scary over 120... keep in mind that car did use rack & pinion steering; it was the old recirculating ball-type, drag links and all... it was slow and sloppy when you were all hands on deck trying to drive it like it was stolen. Also, those cars were sitting on 16" wheels and the tires had not matured to the level we're at now. The 4th Gen car was so much better, so much more refined... of course, by standards other than the pony car, both cars were arcane and dinosaur like.
The Fox body was saddled with 15" wheels and a suspension that was all 1978 technology; even the 1994+ cars were sitting on the original Fox floorpan, albeit modified enough for it to be considered Fox 4. The 2005+ Mustangs were sitting on the larger DEW (RWD) world chassis which was much more stable.
park a 2005+ next to a 70's F-body (which I consider to be HUGE and Heavy cars), the new Mustangs makes that Camaro/Firebird look very small.
...but loads of fun.