Posted by Professor Chaos That;s cause you need to set up an array. SCSI is NOT like EIDE. You also need to usually install 3rd party drivers at the begining of the installation for the SCSI/RAID header so Windows installation knows where to look for the drives. Good luck using 98 (it usually dosnt let you do this, you'll have to use an NT based system, nor do I think 98 supports dual CPU systems).
|
Where did you get the idea it's a SCSI system? The only drive shown is an ATA drive and he makes no mention of it.
You certainly can run SCSI drives outside an array though - not sure why you think it's required - you don't need a RAID configured to run SCSI drives.
Typically you will need a driver for the SCSI controller to load during OS setup unless it's fairly generic then XP should support it by default.
And, you are right - 98 won't support dual CPU's - Trevor, I'd recommend you find a copy of XP, 2000 or some flavor of linux to run on that box. You'll probably have a lot less driver issues with XP because the age of that box most everything should be supported native in the OS.
Is the hard drive error your getting say that no drive was found or that there is no partition on the drive for it to copy files?
If it's just a partition problem I'd recommend you get a boot disk from the bootdisk.com website - get in there and wipe the disk clean then setup a Fat32 partition on the drive so windows install has some place to temp copy files while it starts up. If the drive is configured for some Nix release or strange windows partition format windows won't even give you the option to part the drive during setup. This usually happens because of an incompatible setting in the MBR.
If you want to get really tricky with it I'd use their bootdisk to partition and format the drive - then install win98 source files on the disk and install directly from the drive - it's quite a bit quicker that way.