UER Mobile Forum

UER Mobile Forum UER Mobile - Not logged in
Home Search User Search Login Register
Messages New Posts Favourites Recent Posts Recent Views My LDB My Buddies

< (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)[6](7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21-31)>
UER Mobile > Private Boards Index > Related Photo Forum (Any) > Counting by numbers (Viewed 131004 times)

post by metawaffle

|

|

King of Puns

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 100 on 1/28/2010 10:24 PM >

Posted by trent
Seriously. I was waiting for a couple weeks for the 69 thing. Meh. 88's coming up and it's better that 69 anyway, that's because with 88 get ate twice.

Of course, 88 is also a symbolic number for neo-nazi extremists. Maybe we can find a middle-ground between those two ideas?

| Reply with Quote

post by SoNaive

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 101 on 1/29/2010 12:10 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by MutantMandias

|

|

Perverse and Often Baffling

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 102 on 1/29/2010 12:56 AM >

Why the fuck do this I started this thing?

jesus fucking christ. why didn't anyone tell me i was having a stroke?

| Reply with Quote

post by metawaffle

|

|

King of Puns

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 103 on 1/29/2010 1:07 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by Yami Doki

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 104 on 1/29/2010 1:39 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by SoNaive

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 105 on 1/29/2010 2:06 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by metawaffle

|

|

King of Puns

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 106 on 1/29/2010 2:09 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by metawaffle

|

|

King of Puns

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 107 on 1/29/2010 2:12 AM >

Fine! We'll play it your way...

| Reply with Quote

post by yota94

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 108 on 1/29/2010 2:22 AM >

Posted by metawaffle

Wrong kind of dirty!

rofl

| Reply with Quote

post by atomx

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 109 on 1/29/2010 11:28 AM >

| Reply with Quote

post by metawaffle

|

|

King of Puns

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 110 on 1/29/2010 12:24 PM >

| Reply with Quote

post by rob.i.am

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 111 on 1/29/2010 12:58 PM >

| Reply with Quote

post by trent

|

|

I'm Trent! Get Bent!

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 112 on 1/29/2010 1:02 PM >

| Reply with Quote

post by atomx

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 113 on 1/29/2010 2:06 PM >

| Reply with Quote

post by SoNaive

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 114 on 1/29/2010 3:50 PM >

| Reply with Quote

post by Yami Doki

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 115 on 1/29/2010 5:49 PM >

[last edit 1/29/2010 10:49 PM by Yami Doki - edited 1 times]

| Reply with Quote

post by SoNaive

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 116 on 1/29/2010 10:22 PM >

Dammit, this thread is supposed to be work safe.

| Reply with Quote

post by Yami Doki

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 117 on 1/29/2010 10:50 PM >

sorry, fixed.

| Reply with Quote

post by MutantMandias

|

|

Perverse and Often Baffling

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 118 on 1/30/2010 12:06 AM >

Posted by SoNaive
Dammit, this thread is supposed to be work safe.

Wha? Who said that?

| Reply with Quote

post by rob.i.am

|

|

Re: Counting by numbers
<Reply # 119 on 1/30/2010 12:36 AM >

| Reply with Quote

Reply
< (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)[6](7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21-31)>

This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

78 ms gen time