|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
telefontubbie
Location: Latvia, Riga Gender: Female Total Likes: 158 likes
"No Trespassing" - It's an invitation!
| | | Re: Risks of being personally identifiable on UER? < Reply # 30 on 10/21/2015 8:40 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | For a while i didn't put full name on flickr(it's for hosting pictures here and other UE forums). Then i realized that i am a reasonable person and i don't post pictures of obvious trespass acts which are in guarded places. Then i wrote my full name because sometimes i ask some information about places to other flickr users. It's just polite to introduce myself as a real person who clearly don't have any bad intentions (dunno,throw a massive vodka party, spray-paint everything or burn old tires). Waiting is a good option, by the way. From my experience - years passed so places changed - some became demolished to the ground, some rebuilt, some became really abandoned. After a long time i posted some pictures of those places which used to be guarded, 6 (!) or 4 years after explorations. Because if i do so, nobody really can care anymore. Would you care about trespass act AFTER the place is gone or changed so much it's not quite the same place anymore? Nope? Then you got this idea. But if you post some really, really suspicious content (pictures of breaking in maybe, unscrewing entrances or whatsoever,jumping over fence, anything that clearly points of you trespassing guarded place) it's just stupid, with or without nickname as everybody tried to say previously.
| |
| Aran
Location: Kansas City Gender: Male Total Likes: 1848 likes
Huh. I guess covid made me a trendsetter.
| | | Re: Risks of being personally identifiable on UER? < Reply # 33 on 12/4/2015 1:35 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by rob.i.am Statute. It's statute of limitations, not statue.
|
[last edit 12/4/2015 1:36 AM by Aran - edited 2 times]
| "Sorry, I didn't know I'm not supposed to be here," he said, knowing full well he wasn't supposed to be there. |
| VAD
Location: Toronto Total Likes: 161 likes
Forgive us our trespasses
| | | | Re: Risks of being personally identifiable on UER? < Reply # 35 on 12/4/2015 3:32 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Generally, the police are not your concern. Your concern is the owners of the place, and then, only certain locations. For this reason, I generally don't consider statutes of limitations for whether or not to post things. Sure, you can't get a ticket - but locations can ban you, try to sue you, etc. Some fun stories of this happening: 1) Ninjalicious was infamous for exploring Union Station in Toronto, and security there got wind of it. They scoured the web for a photo of him, and managed to find one completely unrelated to UE - but it was enough for them to apprehend him when he was just using Union (not exploring it), take a real photo of him and use that to ban him from the station. 2) I got caught once in a large complex falling under government jurisdiction - since it did, I was able to use a Freedom of Information request to find out what dirt they dug up on me in the investigation. It was a few years ago, so I didn't have much of an online presence then - but I could see that had I been caught now and investigated as thoroughly as I was then, I'd have been in a lot more trouble. The "investigation" essentially amounted to Googling my name with a few keywords, but they also interrogated people close to me (friends, boss, etc) so would have found out my UER handle one way or another had I had one at the time.
[last edit 12/4/2015 3:36 AM by VAD - edited 2 times]
| -VAD |
| catdog23
Location: Limestone City Total Likes: 130 likes
| | | Re: Risks of being personally identifiable on UER? < Reply # 36 on 12/4/2015 5:37 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by The Viscount Andrew Dalton I've heard the "6 months" figure cited countless times now, but when I looked it up I could not find any reference to it in legislation. Can you point me to your reference for it being 6 months?
| "Why that's easy Viscount, why let us see what papa Google has to say..." I cannot for the life of me find it; this six month figure isn't in the Trespass to Property Act, wtf people? The closest thing I have found is that the Ontario Limitations Act says that Provincial Offences have a basic time limit of 2 years. This is wayyy too long to wait to post pics. This goes for the $65 fine thing as well, I've found the maximum fine is $2000, but I've been unable to see why it seems everyone gets the $65 standard. Posted by The Viscount Andrew Dalton The "investigation" essentially amounted to Googling my name with a few keywords, but they also interrogated people close to me (friends, boss, etc) |
That first part sounds about right, but how'd that 'interrogate' people, was it just like a phone call?
| |
| |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 732 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739790364 pages have been generated.
|
|