|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
867 online
Server Time:
2024-05-06 03:57:55
|
|
|
lkr0204
Location: Chandler, AZ Gender: Male Total Likes: 5 likes
| | | Rails and Train Car Critique < on 3/17/2021 4:31 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | These images were took in two different places but had the same relative interest. The photos uploaded to UER are scaled down significantly and a lot of quality was lost to meet the 100K. For the full quality of the photos please refer the imgur gallery. https://imgur.com/gallery/2m3GPrv Location 1 Location 2 Train Car at Location 1 Thanks for any critique! Edit: The camera used was a Nikon D7200. The first photo was 3000 x 2400 with a F number of 5.6. The second photo was 5000 x 4000 with a F number of 5.6. The third photo was 2500 x 2000 with an unknown F number.
[last edit 3/17/2021 4:43 PM by lkr0204 - edited 1 times]
| Life isn't like the movies. |
| kabdad
Location: Georgia - Mostly Gender: Male Total Likes: 32 likes
| | | | Re: Rails and Train Car Critique < Reply # 6 on 3/19/2021 7:54 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | There aren't bad, so you kinda have to look a little harder to critique. To me, the sky is a bit overblown, or overexposed. I'm not a big fan of shot 1 in general. Hard to put a finger on it, just doesn't really work that well for me. I like shot 2, although a bit boring the lines are good. I would possibly try a polarizing filter to help with the sky, or try a smaller aperture, or faster shutter, but this is probably being picky and more personal preference than critique. I also like shot 3. I like the close focus, but wish the item in focus wasn't so plain...again, working with what you got, so what do you do. I like the depth. It's a little bright for my taste, but nice job overall. Thanks for sharing and feel free to judge me harshly in return!
| |
| lkr0204
Location: Chandler, AZ Gender: Male Total Likes: 5 likes
| | | Re: Rails and Train Car Critique < Reply # 7 on 3/22/2021 6:51 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by kabdad There aren't bad, so you kinda have to look a little harder to critique. To me, the sky is a bit overblown, or overexposed. I'm not a big fan of shot 1 in general. Hard to put a finger on it, just doesn't really work that well for me. I like shot 2, although a bit boring the lines are good. I would possibly try a polarizing filter to help with the sky, or try a smaller aperture, or faster shutter, but this is probably being picky and more personal preference than critique. I also like shot 3. I like the close focus, but wish the item in focus wasn't so plain...again, working with what you got, so what do you do. I like the depth. It's a little bright for my taste, but nice job overall. Thanks for sharing and feel free to judge me harshly in return!
|
Thank you! In photo 1 it might be a bit over exposed but I’m not quite sure what’s wrong with the sky in photo 2. For the third it also might be a bit bright and I probably should’ve messed with the focus to see if I could make it more interesting. Thanks again!
| Life isn't like the movies. |
|
|
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 156 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 740757277 pages have been generated.
|
|