 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
700 online
Server Time:
2024-05-10 11:14:20
|
|
|
 Stalker
   
Location: Hamilton
Your Resident Red Commie Bastard
 |  | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 40 on 11/21/2003 9:15 PM >
|  | | | Nitroglycerin then. But who cares really. Breaking doors and destroy locks for purpose of entering is a criminal act. Break and Enter. Just in case you don't know .
|
|
'Dukes
Noble Donor
Gender: Male
At least someone llikes me
| |  | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 41 on 11/21/2003 11:21 PM >
| | | | Posted by Stalker
Nitroglycerin then. But who cares really. Breaking doors and destroy locks for purpose of entering is a criminal act. Break and Enter. Just in case you don't know.
|
To play devil's advocate, so is trespassing.
I got your tour winner right here pussies, at least he'd crash out trying. |
|
Intalex
This member has been banned
Ascended Being
| | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 42 on 11/22/2003 11:05 AM >
|  | | | Oh ffs, people really! Most of you more likely break the law by speeding on your way to the site.
We all break the law from time to time. It's no excuse to break as many laws as you can, and the mere fact that you've already broken the law shouldn't be your excuse for breaking more laws, but we still all need to accept the fact that there will never be such a thing as "totally ethical exploring".
I am so sick of you panzies fighting over these stupid ethics. And I am also sick of everyone wildly throwing insinuations and accusations around.
To be honest it's not worth discussing. Best just to keep our ethics out of it and hope that we all have the common sense and the common decency to do what is right. Or at least vaguely right.
There are varying degree's of seriousness to a crime, but that doesnt make one more right to do than the other.
I feel trespassing can be justified for the sake of historical documentation, capturing the art of nature, and fulfilling curiousity without harming anything. But nobody can justify one crime over another. They are all equally wrong, so try and keep your number of crimes to a bare minimum.
"What's that smell?" "Oh that would be me, I've been swimming in raw sewage, I love it!" - Naked Gun |
|
stealthy
You got a problem bro?
| | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 43 on 11/23/2003 12:10 AM >
| | | | Posted by Twin Turbo
Oh ffs, people really! Most of you more likely break the law by speeding on your way to the site.
I am so sick of you panzies fighting over these stupid ethics. And I am also sick of everyone wildly throwing insinuations and accusations around.
|
I don't have a car! So there!
And going to your second comment, you can go to hell as far as i'm concerned. You just come on this forum thinking you know everything just because you own a fucking NBC suit and camp out near sites! You just registered like two weeks ago, and you call us PANZIES. You don't evem know half the people on this board! You can go blow it out your ass! We aren't fucking fighting over these ethics, we are simply discussing them!
[Sorry to mods, couldn't hold it in]
[On a lighter note, and to stay on topic, I don't carry lockpicks, because the cops are really mean and they will throw you in jail for a week if you look at them wrong.]
[last edit 11/23/2003 12:14 AM by stealthy - edited 1 times]
|
|
'Dukes
Noble Donor
Gender: Male
At least someone llikes me
| | | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 44 on 11/23/2003 12:47 AM >
| | | | Posted by Twin Turbo
I feel trespassing can be justified for the sake of historical documentation, capturing the art of nature, and fulfilling curiousity without harming anything. But nobody can justify one crime over another. They are all equally wrong, so try and keep your number of crimes to a bare minimum.
|
I understand where you're coming from, but where does it end? I'll walk into an abandoned building marked "no trespass" just because it's there to limit liability. But if it's locked, it's locked for a reason.
My ex girlfriend's parents lived in a "historic" house , but if you picked that lock or broke the door down, her father would put a .45 ACP between your eyes before you could put on your night vision goggles.
Just a point to be careful .. you never know who's behing that door..
On a positive note, how's the website coming?
I got your tour winner right here pussies, at least he'd crash out trying. |
|
Intalex
This member has been banned
Ascended Being
| | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 45 on 11/23/2003 4:45 AM >
| | | | Great thanks, I'm still working on appearance and design at the moment. I wanna keep it simple but good looking at least...
As for the comments about me thinking I know everything because I use an NBC suit and camp out at sites, well you have to admit stealthy now you are just being stupid...
You've all already discussed the ethics to death as far as I am concerned. You fight about it in threads that aren't asking for ethical related issues to be resolved through debate.
It causes off topic arguments that end in flaming and it isnt worth the fuss. I don't already know any of you, your right, and that panzy thing was just a little joke, but I don't need to be a forum vet to know that your "discussions" get out of hand sometimes.
Especially when its down to ethics.
"What's that smell?" "Oh that would be me, I've been swimming in raw sewage, I love it!" - Naked Gun |
|
Crossfire
Location: Kay-Dub
Gender: Male
Don't call it a comeback, I've been here for years.
| |  | |  | Re: Padlocks and cheap picks
<Reply # 46 on 11/23/2003 3:44 PM >
| | | | Topic, children, topic.
Let's try to keep this on track, okay?
C.
Disgruntled. |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 156 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741237294 pages have been generated.
|
|
