|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
777 online
Server Time:
2024-05-15 02:03:27
|
|
|
greywolf45
Location: U.S.A. Gender: Male Total Likes: 0 likes
Resident UER pain in the ass
| | | | | Re: JFK assasination < Reply # 14 on 5/22/2005 2:34 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by PAWolf Funny this topic should come up. I've been playing JFK reloaded quite a bit lately and it's convinced me that Oswald definitely could have operated by himself. Oswald wouldn't have needed any help those shots IMO. I'll write more later, I need to goto bed. -pawolf
| The angle from the school book depository is all wrong. If you will take a look at the home movie showing the actual impact of the bullet, President Kennedy's head snaps back, and the back of the head explodes, with the flesh, bone, blood, and brain matter flying backwards, spraying the back of the limo. The ballistics evidence supports this also. This tells me that a high velocity, possibly small caliber bullet was used, (possibly a 5.56mm NATO), with the killing shot coming from the front of the motorcade. The 6.5mm Carcano is not a high velocity round, and the rounds Oswald was using were full metal jacket. This means that the rounds fired at Kennedy would pass through, making a neat hole going in and out. The destruction seen in autopsy photos could have only been caused by a high velocity round, hollow point possibly. If you could only see the wounds a 5.56mm NATO round causes upon impact would convince you of the same. Take a look at the home movie that shows the impact of the fatal round. Edit: I have a copy of the Zapruder film (i hope i spelled the name right).
[last edit 5/22/2005 2:35 AM by greywolf45 - edited 1 times]
| "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends" Martin Luther King Jr. |
| Explorer Zero
Total Likes: 2027 likes
| | | | Re: JFK assasination < Reply # 15 on 5/22/2005 4:24 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by greywolf45
The angle from the school book depository is all wrong. If you will take a look at the home movie showing the actual impact of the bullet, President Kennedy's head snaps back, and the back of the head explodes, with the flesh, bone, blood, and brain matter flying backwards, spraying the back of the limo. The ballistics evidence supports this also. This tells me that a high velocity, possibly small caliber bullet was used, (possibly a 5.56mm NATO), with the killing shot coming from the front of the motorcade. The 6.5mm Carcano is not a high velocity round, and the rounds Oswald was using were full metal jacket. This means that the rounds fired at Kennedy would pass through, making a neat hole going in and out. The destruction seen in autopsy photos could have only been caused by a high velocity round, hollow point possibly. If you could only see the wounds a 5.56mm NATO round causes upon impact would convince you of the same. Take a look at the home movie that shows the impact of the fatal round. Edit: I have a copy of the Zapruder film (i hope i spelled the name right).
| I would offer this in rebuttal, the 6.5x52mm Carcano is a high velocity round depending on the load 2400 - 2600 fps, the 5.56x45 round is about 2800. Not significantly different (the 6.5 actually delivers more energy as the bullet weighs about 3 times as much). After watching the Zapruder film for the last 40 years in slo-mo forwards backwards close up and digitally enhanced I have changed my opinion, I once believed there was a frontal shot too but all the evidence in that film is consistent and could be caused by a rear shot. (stuff blows out both sides) (large flap of scalp flops up in front the backward jerk is caused by upper body nervous system reaction to the shock) Remember when he was hit that time he was till very much alive. 2400 fps will create enough hydro-static shock to produce these effects. The single bullet theory where Governor Conally was hit in the wrist by one round that exited JFK's throat was demonstrated on several occasions one using lasers and its been running on the Discovery channel for years. So whats all the debate. People say one man with a rifle couldnt fire 3 shots with that accuracy. Thats bullshit too. It was under 100 yards, moving slow and and away, come on, the accuracy required was not that great, any of those shots couldve missed just as well as hit, there is such thing as a lucky shot too. Well down here in redneck country as you call it we consider accuracy to be one round per running jack rabbit at 100yds as pretty good whereas some folks may think thats impossible or a some kind of miracle. You wouldnt know this unless you are yourself a shooter or hunter. Many average marksman could and have demonstrated this was no super human feat of skill. The real mystery isnt how but who and why. I buy the lone gunman theory now as much as I wanted to believe it was Cuban hit teams in the storm drains with silencers etc, and I buy the magic bullet explanation too. Im still not convinced Oswald acted alone but I suppose he could have. As another post says too much wierd shit was associated with the witnesses and evidence. True but even some of that can be explained. The .38 ACP casings found by officer Tippet when Oswald was carrying a .38spl revolver when arrested? Maybe he carried two handguns and ditched one. Maybe a cop tossed em there. Maybe the one that said he found them. The bullet laying on the gurney at Parkland hospital, couldve been a plant but I saw a .30 cal slug fall out of a deer when it was loaded in the bed of a truck. When you look at all the witnesses (even some as late as the 1990s) that came forward then disappeared or assumed room temperature under strange circumstances its almost too much to ask anyone to believe. I think LBJ and his cronies were in it up to their collective asses, if one disgruntled little Cuban sympathizer did it why all the cover up man? uh, wait a minute I think I hear someone at the door.....
| |
| |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 250 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741770357 pages have been generated.
|
|