Posted by underdark
Ummm, this is the same bullshit argument that islamists use. That you can't appreciate the intention of their holy books unless you read them in the original language. And it's bullshit there too.
|
Actually, I don't think it is BS. Things get lost in translation all the time, and I think the Muslims' belief that the Koran can only be understood in the original Arabic isn't that far off the mark. As an example, there's a passage in the Bible that reads something like it's easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a man to get into heaven. The camel/eye things has been the subject of debate for probably centuries. I've read that it's a mistranslation from the original Aramaic, and actually referenced a gate or arch somewhere.
Words have meanings. They have books full of meanings for words called dictionaries. If you're saying the words don't mean what they mean unless you can read AND believe in god then you have rendered your own arguments moot because that would imply that they could mean anything. |
It's really a logical fallacy: You have to believe something is true in order to understand it. Not
assume it's true; believe it's true.