|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
777 online
Server Time:
2024-04-30 00:43:14
|
|
|
MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: What are you wrong about? < Reply # 42 on 6/16/2012 1:19 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | There is no point when a "child" comes into being, so talking about "killing a child" is pointless. I assume that you are okay with letting sperm die, and I assume that you are okay with a woman not impregnating every egg that she ovulates. Every sane person agrees about that. You seem to believe that the moment the sperm and egg touch changes things. The majority of people dont, but a lot do. I have never heard any reasonable explanation for this belief. I believe that there is no issue whatsoever with squishing a zygote. It is no more concerning than blowing your nose. I don't believe that a baby that can survive on its own outside of the mother should be killed. In between those two points is fuzzy. I don't have an exact point in time in mind, because there is no rational point in time that is definable as the point that a human starts. The fun thing is, the mere fact that you and I disagree on this point demonstrates that you are wrong. The only way to reasonably talk about this as a society is to use the view of the members of the society in general. Since you pick one point in time, and I say that it is some indeterminate later time, the resulting consensus is some indeterminate time after the time that you say. There is no question that the vast majority of people fall somewhere in this spectrum, as opposed to right on the fringe that you proclaim. So, this society views the ending of life after conception as acceptable. There is no exact point when it is right or wrong according to our society, and if you were able to mathematically determine the exact consensus point, it would constantly be moving back and forth in time. Of course, there wil be laws defined, and they must have some specifics, because that's how shit works. I don't claim that I can pick the "right" number of days, but I am generally okay with the first 2 trimesters as a guideline. The whole process of people arguing about it and debating it and affecting law makers is the closest we can get to finding the societal consensus. So, your position pulls society closer to your point of demarcation, but it is the absolute fringe edge, and your position is absolutely not the answer for our society as a whole.
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
| |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 250 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739915600 pages have been generated.
|
|