|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
earthworm
Location: General Area Gender: Male Total Likes: 2 likes
| | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 30 on 3/1/2012 5:26 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | |
| Tourism, human circulation considered as consumption is fundamentally nothing more than the leisure of going to see what has become banal. |
| splumer
Location: Cleveland, Ohio Gender: Male Total Likes: 201 likes
| | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 33 on 3/1/2012 3:31 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by MrGreenJeans What does the right to peaceably assemble have to do with anything?
| It was a joke. You know, "assembly?" Anytime the government forces someone to do something they don't want to do it is tyranny. | By that logic, any law is tyranny, and only complete, total anarchy is freedom. Which, of course, is true, but it's also antithetical to human nature. But your point about Constitutional powers is well-taken. The problem, though, is that not every power the gov't has is in the Constitution. Enforcing the law is a constitutional (I hate typing that word out) power, but the details of the law are left off. Thats an failing argument. If you don't like public schools you're free to homeschool your kids, or send them to private schools. The government isn't forcing you to utilize public schools, if they were that would be tyrannical. I won't waste my time on the other two "examples". | You're also free to put a gun to your head and blow your brains out, thus eliminating any worry about any of this, but is that really a choice? No, it isn't. For the vast majority of people in the US, public schools aren't a choice, and school is compulsory, as it should be.
| “We are not going to have the kind of cooperation we need if everyone insists on their own narrow version of reality. … the great divide in the world today … is between people who have the courage to listen and those who are convinced that they already know it all.” -Madeline Albright |
| MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 34 on 3/1/2012 3:46 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by MrGreenJeans Thats an failing argument. If you don't like public schools you're free to homeschool your kids, or send them to private schools. The government isn't forcing you to utilize public schools, if they were that would be tyrannical. I won't waste my time on the other two "examples".
| And I can't believe I'm wasting my time on you... yet again... but you said Posted by MrGreenJeans When a government forces citizens to do things they object to based on their rights according to our Constitution, using powers not granted it by the Constitution, then it becomes tyrannical.
|
You are forced to pay for public schools, whether you use them or not. TYRANNY!
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
| MrGreenJeans This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Total Likes: 0 likes
| | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 35 on 3/2/2012 3:23 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Sure it's a choice splumer! ready, aim, fire. At least we agree on something mutant, forcing people to pay for public schools they do not use, against their will, is tyrannical. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. I don't remember reading anything in the Constitution giving the government the right to force private individuals or companies to purchase insurance they have a moral objection to. Maybe it would be better left to "the people" to decide for themselves. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; If my religious beliefs are such that I cannot, in good conscience, support abortions then the government forcing me to do so is prohibiting my free exercise of religion in violation of the Constitution.
| |
| MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 38 on 3/2/2012 11:29 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by MrGreenJeans At least we agree on something mutant, forcing people to pay for public schools they do not use, against their will, is tyrannical.
|
And there it is. You just want to define things that you don't like as tyrannical. Logic and consistency are not terribly important in your world view. Of course, "forcing people to pay for public schools they do not use" actually is a part of the Constitution, and therefore not tyranny, from your recent assertions. Posted by MrGreenJeans If my religious beliefs are such that I cannot, in good conscience, support abortions then the government forcing me to do so is prohibiting my free exercise of religion in violation of the Constitution.
|
Yes yes yes. Tyranny all over this bitch. In fact, by your jello-like definitions, there is nothing which is not tyranny, which is awesomely cool.
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
| splumer
Location: Cleveland, Ohio Gender: Male Total Likes: 201 likes
| | | Re: Contraceptives & Catholics < Reply # 39 on 3/2/2012 2:32 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by MrGreenJeans Sure it's a choice splumer! ready, aim, fire. At least we agree on something mutant, forcing people to pay for public schools they do not use, against their will, is tyrannical.
| There's a street in my town called Mallo Place. It doesn't go anywhere, so I have never driven on it, and I've lived here, on and off, for 40 years. Is it tyranny that I should be forced to pay for maintenance on a street I will never use? No, because it's there should I choose or need to use it. Same with public schools, except that the whole community (defined very broadly) benefits from an educated population. Even for the kids selling you Taco Bell. Yeah, the register makes change, but they have to have at least a little math skills to know if the register says to give you $20 in change for a $10 bill, there's something wrong. Not to mention the fact that people who are educated get better jobs and are less likely to commit crimes, get pregnant before they're ready, smoke, or do other things that cost society money. So yeah, you might not use public schools, but you enjoy their benefits every single day, sweet cheeks. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. I don't remember reading anything in the Constitution giving the government the right to force private individuals or companies to purchase insurance they have a moral objection to. Maybe it would be better left to "the people" to decide for themselves.
| You have a moral objection to insurance? Why, because it's too much like gambling? I oppose forcing people to buy insurace, too, but because it's a handout to insurance companies. My sister-in-law is a nurse at St. Vincent's Charity Hospital, a Catholic hospital in Cleveand. I asked her if birth conttrol pills were covered under her perscription drug plan. She said they were. So, technically, the Catholics are already covering birth control. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; If my religious beliefs are such that I cannot, in good conscience, support abortions then the government forcing me to do so is prohibiting my free exercise of religion in violation of the Constitution.
| Though I don't share your views, I understand and respect them. However, if people didn't have to support anything the gov't did that they found morally objectionable, nothing would be supported! I don't like the military. Jeepdave doesn't like the National Endowment for the Arts, someone else might be a couch potato and not like the National Parks, and no one likes income tax. See where that would leave us? And I'll repeat what I said before: no one's free exercise of religion is being prohibited. If you have a moral objection to porn, don't use it. But you shouldn't be allowed to determine what I whack off to. Here's an idea: why not let the employees vote on whether they want birth control included in their health coverage?
| “We are not going to have the kind of cooperation we need if everyone insists on their own narrow version of reality. … the great divide in the world today … is between people who have the courage to listen and those who are convinced that they already know it all.” -Madeline Albright |
|
|
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 164 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 740964544 pages have been generated.
|
|